10 Most Important Questions

This is the next survey for people who already use Verifika. We plan to introduce a lot of new interesting features and would like to know what you think about them. This is your chance to influence on Verifika behavior and appearance and indeed to become eligible to free one-month subscription to Verifika!

Your Name*

Your Email*

1. Purchase. Do you consider buying Verifika after the trial period?


Why?*

2. Generic work. Is parameter setup and work with reports and auto-fixes convenient at the moment?

Would you like to change something?

3. Report display. If you know how to use grouping and sorting in reports (it is explained in “Setting Up the Display of the Report Window Tabs” under the “Report Window” in Help), do you have any comments on the way it works by default?

4. Report toolbar. We plan to introduce a report toolbar that will contain commands to

  • change an errors status
  • apply an autofix
  • edit a segment manually
  • manage grid state (apply some predefined grouping/sorting options, create new ones, expand/collapse all error groups, collapse current group)

Do you have any ideas on what other operations need to be added to this toolbar?

5. Profiles. Describe your ideal profile to share settings between projects. You may want to have no profiles at all, just say: create a new project with settings like in that one, or you may want to have language-based profiles or anything else?

6. Restore settings. Would you like to have a possibility to revert settings to:

  • previous state
  • saved state
  • profile-defined state?


If yes, please describe when you needed or may need such a possibility?

7. Search. Would you like to have a possibility to search in project's bilingual files?

If yes, what options interest you?




8. Analytics. Would you like the following analytics options built into Verifika?


Any comments?

9. Statistics. Would you like to have a possibility to have project statistics (found and fixed errors, etc.)?

Any comments?

10. Inconsistency autofix. At the moment, no autofixes are provided for consistency errors detected ignoring tags and/or case because tags and/or cases may differ, and an autofix may corrupt them. Would you like to have partial autofixes for such cases, where they are safe?

Any comments?

If you have more notes, questions or suggestions, please remember we’re glad to hear, consider and answer!

Thank you in advance for your contribution and we hope you’ll enjoy your work with Verifika!